29 / 154
Contents
xxix
PREDICTORS OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS AGED 80 YEARS OR OLDER
UNDERGOING CANCER SURGERY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S83
TREATMENT OF CHEMO-RESISTANT CANCERS IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION: ROLE OF MOLECULAR
TUMOR PROFILING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S84
USING BIG DATA IN ONCOLOGY TO PROSPECTIVELY IMPACT CLINICAL PATIENT CARE: A PROOF OF
CONCEPT STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S84
GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF GENITOURINARY CANCER SITE GROUP: THE GERIATRIC
ONCOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S85
PRE-OPERATIVE ASSESSMENT AND POST-OPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF ELDERLY WOMEN WITH
GYNECOLOGIC CANCERS, PRIMARY ANALYSIS OF NRG CC-002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S86
PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL DECLINE AND 1 YEAR SURVIVAL IN ELDERLY CANCER PATIENTS USING
COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S86
CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF ONCOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS IN FRAIL ELDERLY PATIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S87
EVALUATION OF PATIENT PERCEPTIONS OF TEAM BASED CARE IN A GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
MULTIDISCIPLINARY INTERPROFESSIONAL CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S88
A CHALLENGE IN ONCOGERIATRICS: IS ROCKWOOD FRAILTY INDEX AN ACCURATE TOOL TO PREDICT
CLINICAL OUTCOMES? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S88
THE ONCOLOGICAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL PROGNOSTIC INDEX (ONCO-MPI) HELPS PREDICTING
BENEFITS OF TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE
SINGLE CENTER STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S89
FUNCTIONALDECLINE INOLDERPATIENTSWITHCANCERRECEIVINGCHEMOTHERAPY:AMULTICENTER
PROSPECTIVE STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S89
SCREENING FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH PROBLEMS IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH CANCER: EFFECT
OF VARYING GOLD STANDARD DEFINITIONS ON THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF THE G8 AND
MODIFIED G8 SCREENING TOOLS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S90
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT GUIDED MULTIDISCIPLINARY
INTERVENTIONS: THE FIRST YEAR EXPERIENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S91
EVALUATION OF THE G8, VES-13 AND FRIED FRAILTY CRITERIA AS SCREENING TOOLS FOR
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH PROBLEMS IN PATIENTS ENROLLED IN A PHASE II TRIAL OF GERIATRIC
ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT FOR OLDER ADULTS WITH CANCER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S91
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FLEMISH VERSION OF TRIAGE RISK SCREENING TOOL IN DETECTING FRAILTY
IN ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY SURGERY: A PILOT STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S92
DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ONCOGERIATRIC COHORT OF PICARDY (COPAGE): CORRELATION
BETWEEN G8 AND THE BALDUCCI SCORE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S93
STUDY PROTOCOL: GERIATRIC SCREENING TOOLS AND THE OUTCOME OF TREATMENT IN
ONCOGERIATRIC PATIENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S93
PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FRAILTY CLASSIFICATIONS IN OLDER PATIENTSWITH CANCER: PROSPECTIVE
ELCAPA COHORT STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S94
A PILOT STUDY OF AN ACCELERATOR EQUIPPED SMARTPHONE TO MONITOR OLDER ADULTS WITH
CANCER RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY IN MEXICO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S95
IMPLEMENTATION OF A GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY UNIT TO HELP OLDER CANCER PATIENTS WITH
DECISION-MAKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S95
TRANS SECTORAL CARE OF GERIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC
ASSESSMENT AND PATIENT-REPORTED QUALITY OF LIFE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S96
EVALUATION OF TWO ONCO-GERIATRIC SCORE SYSTEMS FOR PREDICTION OF THERAPY-ASSOCIATED
TOXICITY IN ELDERLY CANCER PATIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S97
FOUR MODELS OF FRAILTY IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS QUALIFIED FOR ELECTIVE SURGERY . . . . . .S97
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE G8 SCREENING TOOLS IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN FRENCH GUIANA . . . . . . . . . . . .S98
FUNCTIONAL DEPENDANCY IS PREDICTIVE FOR NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN ELDERY PATIENTS WITH
HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S98
COMPARING TRADITIONAL PERFORMANCE STATUS ASSESSMENT WITH MOBILE HEALTH ACTIVITY
DATA AS A MEASURE OF FUNCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S99
QUALITY OF LIFE AND EARLY MORTALITY IN OLDER CANCER PATIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S99
THE USE A COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT TO SEARCH FOR FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH
HIGHER RISK OF SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S100
VALUE OF GERIATRIC SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT IN PREDICTING POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
IN PATIENTS OLDER THAN 70 YEARS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER. . . . . . . . . . . . .S101
FRAILTY AND SURVIVAL IN OLD PATIENTS WITH CANCER; CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND SYSTEMATIC
GERIATRIC ASSESSMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S101
A PROSPECTIVE NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY ON THE USE OF BEVACIZUMAB AND CONVENTIONAL
CHEMOTHERAPY FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL (MCRC) PATIENTS:
SCREENING AND GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT (GA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S102
CANCER SURVIVORSHIP AND AGING – IS IT SO DIFFERENT FOR ELDERLY AND YOUNG? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S103
EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT (CGA) IN OLDER PATIENTS
WITH KIDNEY CANCER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S103