Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  138 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 138 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

S108

A B S T R A C T S

P121

PREHABILITATION AND REHABILITATION IN

ONCOGERIATRICS: ADAPTATION TO DISEASE AND

ACCOMPANIMENT OF PATIENTS’ TRAJECTORIES

O. Le Saux

1,

*, C. Falandry

1

1

Geriatric oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite,

France

Introduction:

Many oncological situations induce complex

medical and surgical procedures, which may reveal or

decompensate a geriatric underlying vulnerability.The current

developments of outpatient treatment or postoperative rapid

rehabilitation strategies do not take into account this geriatric

vulnerability. A new healthcare organization is therefore

needed in order to develop geriatric rehabilitation.

Objectives:

Our pilot project named PROADAPT (Prehabili-

tation and Rehabilitation in Oncogeriatrics: Adaptation

to Disease and Accompaniment of Patients’ Trajectories)

aims at developing and evaluating a rehabilitation program

integrating interventions to prevent geriatric deconditioning.

This program includes four interventions: (1) a nutritional

management (2) a physical rehabilitation pre- (prehabilitation)

and post-treatment (rehabilitation) (3) the prevention of

iatrogeny and (4) a hospital-home transition.

Methods:

To develop this program, the first step was to

evaluate available scientific data. Four working groups (one

per intervention) consisting of several health professionnals

(nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, geriatricians, oncologists

and surgeons) were formed. We will present the work of

the third group. The search strategy was performed using

Pubmed on April 2016 using Mesh terms (“Medication

Reconciliation”[Mesh] OR “Drug-Related Side Effects

and Adverse Reactions/prevention and control”[Mesh]

OR “Medication Errors/prevention and control”[Mesh])

AND (“Aged”[Mesh] OR “Aged, 80 and over”[Mesh] OR

“Neoplasms”[Mesh]) and limits: “Humans” AND “English”.

Results:

A total of 1490 articles were found and analyzed

by five physicians (three geriatricians, one oncologist and

one pharmacist). To prevent iatrogeny, elements retrieved in

literature with varying levels of evidence were: comprehensive

geriatric assessment to assess risk factors, pharmacists’

interventions [1], medication reconciliation, medication

review [2], therapeutic education programs, outpatient care

transitions programs, computerized physician order entry,

electronic medication administration record. Medication

review included a multistep process: avoid and be vigilant

of high risk drugs, discontinue potentially inappropriate

drugs, consider drugs as a cause of any new symptom and

avoid trating side effects with another drug, avoid drug-

drug or drug-disease interaction, adjust dosing based on

age, creatinine clearance and hepatic function, address

non-adherence, search for duplications or deficiencies in

medications, try to simplify the medication schedule and

search for non pharmacologic alternatives.

Conclusion:

Using available scientific data, the four groups

are currently developing clinical practice guidelines. These

guidelines will enable the construction and implementation

at a regional level of a healthcare system program in geriatric

oncology in order to prevent geriatric decontioning for elderly

cancer patients at high risk of frailty undergoing complex

medical or surgical procedures.

References:

[1] Gillespie U,AlassaadA, Henrohn D, Garmo H, Hammarlund-

Udenaes M, Toss H, et al. A comprehensive pharmacist

intervention to reduce morbidity in patients 80 years

or older: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med.

2009;169(9):894-900. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.71.

[2] Christensen M, Lundh A. Medication review in hospitalized

patients to reduce morbidity and mortality. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD008986. doi:10.1002/14651858.

CD008986.pub3.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Frailty, iatrogeny, nutrition, rehabilitation, surgery

P122

EDUCATING 400 NURSES IN GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY ACROSS

THE US (FUNDED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH

#R25CA183723-01A1)

P. S. Burhenn

1,

*, C. Okamoto

2

, D. Economou

3

, R. Yang

1

, C. Sun

4

,

A. Hurria

5

1

Geriatric Oncology,

2

Professional Practice and Education,

3

Nursing

Research and Education,

4

Outcomes Research,

5

Cancer and Aging

Research Program, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte,

USA

Introduction:

Oncology nurses play a key role in the

healthcare team that interfaces with older patients with

cancer; however, they receive very little education in

evidence-based geriatric practice thus creating a critical

gap in the overall knowledge of how to care for older adults

with cancer. The Institute of Medicine report “Retooling for

an Aging America” identified a critical need to increase the

geriatric education of nurses. We responded by applying for

an NIH R25 grant “Geriatric Oncology: Educating Nurses to

Improve Quality Care” which was awarded to educate 400

oncology nurses in geriatrics.

Objectives:

The objectives of the R25 grant are: 1) To develop

and implement a national curriculum in geriatric oncology

for oncology nurses; and 2) To evaluate the effectiveness of

this curriculum by pre and post knowledge testing, course

evaluations, and evaluation of knowledge integration.

Methods:

The overall 5-year strategy of the program is to

conduct 3-day geriatric oncology courses once per year for

four years (total number trained – 400 nurses).The curriculum

which includes both didactic and interactive sessionswas built

around the principles of geriatric assessment. Expert faculty

in geriatric oncology will develop and deliver the content. The

key domains that are covered include: physiological changes

in aging, comorbidity, functional changes, cognition and

mental status, nutrition, social support, polypharmacy, and

geriatric syndromes.The program also addresses empowering

nurses, working with leadership to implement change,

the interdisciplinary team, caregiver support, and utilizing

community resources. The participants will be competitively

chosen in 3-person teams from each institution based on