Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  86 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

S56

A B S T R A C T S

may be related to the effects of treatments (endocrine

therapy and/or a ‘lack of’ surgery). Further work is required to

investigate this. The study is ongoing and is expanding into a

multi-centre one.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Comprehensive geriatric assessment, mood

assessment, older women, primary breast cancer

P035

ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY AND THE RISK OF

PARKINSONISM IN OLDER MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER

S. M. Alibhai

1,2,

*, R. Sutradhar

3

, J. Rangrej

3

, C. Marras

4

,

N. Fleshner

5

, J. W. Young

1

1

Medicine, University of Toronto,

2

Medicine, University Health

Network,

3

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences,

4

Neurology,

5

Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

Introduction:

Case reports and anecdotal experiences

suggest that some men develop parkinsonism after initiating

androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for the treatment of

prostate cancer, possibly due to neurophysiological effects of

changes in testosterone and/or estrogen.

Objectives:

To investigate whether ADT increases the risk

of parkinsonism in men with prostate cancer.

Methods:

Using linked administrative databases in

Ontario, Canada, men age 40 or older with prostate cancer on

continuous ADT for at least six months or who underwent

bilateral orchiectomy (n=38,931) were matched 1:1 with men

with prostate cancer who had never received ADT. Treated and

untreated groups were range-matched on age at index date and

year of diagnosis, and propensity-matched on comorbidities,

medications, cardiovascular risk factors, and socioeconomic

variables. A competing risks analysis was conducted where the

primary outcome was time to a new diagnosis of parkinsonism,

and time to death was a competing event.

Results:

The cohort had a mean age of 71.9 years and was

followed for a mean of 5.76 years. Under a competing risks

analysis, ADT use was not associated with an increased rate

of parkinsonism. Based on the results from the multivariable

cause-specific hazard regression model, the adjusted

relative rate of experiencing parkinsonism among ADT users

compared to non-users was 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI)

0.67–0.83, p<0.0001).The adjusted relative rate of experiencing

the competing event of death among ADT users compared to

non-users was 1.33 (95% CI 1.30–1.36, p<0.0001). In both sets of

models increasing age was associated with an increasing risk

of parkinsonism. The 5-year incidence of parkinsonism was

1.03% in ADT users versus 1.56% in non-users.

Conclusion:

Contrary to our hypothesis, continuous ADT

use for at least 6 months in men with prostate cancer was not

associated with an increased risk of parkinsonism.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Androgen deprivation therapy, health services

research, parkinsonism, prostate cancer, toxicity

P036

CLINICAL AND TREATMENT FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH

SURVIVAL AMONG WOMEN 70 YEARS AND OLDER WITH

EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER

S. E. Robertson

1,

*, B. R. Khulpateea

1

, Y. Xiong

1

, K. O’Hara

2

,

M. Extermann

1

, H. S. Chon

1

1

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA,

2

Hospital General

Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain

Introduction:

Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed

in the 7

th

and 8

th

decades of life and yet elderly women are

underrepresented in clinical trials that guide physicians’

treatment decisions. As such, elderly patients frequently

receive suboptimal treatment regimens and suffer from

poorer outcomes.

Objectives:

We sought to examine factors associated with

differences in treatment and outcomes among older versus

younger patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective chart review of

323 patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated

at a single institution between January 1, 2001 and April 1,

2014. Patients were excluded from this review if they had a

prior personal history of cancer, had non-epithelial and/or

borderline histology, or if medical records were not available.

Clinical data obtained included disease characteristics

(disease stage, tumor histology and grade), baseline perfor-

mance measures (Karnofsky performance status (KPS), ECOG

Performance score, CIRS-G score, and CIRS-Severity Index),

treatment outcomes (surgical debulking status, type, timing

and number and completeness of chemotherapy regimens

given) and survival data.

Results:

Seventy-one patients (21.98%) were

70 years at

the time of cancer diagnosis. In a univariate analysis, study

subjects 70 years and older were significantly more likely to

have a tumor with serous histology, a higher CIRS-G score, a

higher CIRS-Severity Index,suboptimal surgical debulking,and

fewer total lines of chemotherapy given. Interestingly, ECOG

performance score and KPS were not significantly different

between the age groups. All variables significant to a level of p

0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate

logistic regression analysis. In the multivariate analysis,

subjects

70 years were significantly more likely to have a

higher CIRS-Severity Index (OR 1.31, p=0.007), suboptimal

surgical debulking (OR 2.73, p = 0.03) and were less likely to

complete the recommended first line adjuvant chemotherapy

(OR 0.37, p=0.02). Survival analyses were performed and found

no difference in overall survival between the young and

elder age group (log-rank p=0.08). For the full cohort, factors

independently associated with decreased overall survival (OS)

in a multivariate cox proportional hazard model were higher

CIRS-G score (HR 1.22, p=0.001), suboptimal surgical debulking

(HR 2.36, p=0.0003) andmore total lines of chemotherapy given

(HR 1.10, p=0.008). Endometrioid histology was significantly

associated with improved OS (HR 0.28, p=0.03).

Conclusion:

We did not find a significant difference in

overall survival for patients 70 years or older as compared

to the younger cohort. Instead, survival was significantly

influenced by patient comorbidities as assessed by the CIRS-G

tool, surgical debulking status and total lines of chemotherapy