Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  72 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

S42

A B S T R A C T S

(p=0.2132). Mean (SD) number of days between two visits was

16.55 (9.39) days and 20.83 (17.61) days for bevacizumab- and

conventional chemotherapy respectively.

Table 1 (abstract P010)– Patient demographics at baseline

Chemotherapy +

Chemotherapy

bevazicumab

only

(N=128)

(N=124)

Mean age, years

76.9

78.0

Sex

Male

65%

58%

Female

35%

42%

Chemotherapy treatment

CAPOX – FOLFOX

41 (32.0%)

41 (33.1%)

FOLFIRI

85 (66.4%)

46 (37.1%)

5FU/LV–CAP

2 (1.6%)

37 (29.8%)

ECOG

N=125

N=122

0

61 (48.8%)

52 (42.6%)

1

48 (38.4%)

50 (41.0%)

2

16 (12.8%)

20 (16.4%)

Ongoing medication at baseline

<5

74 (57.8%)

57 (46.0%)

5

54 (42.2%)

67 (54.0%)

Table 2 (abstract P010) – All grade adverse events of interest to

bevacizumab.

Chemotherapy +

Chemotherapy

bevazicumab

only

(N=128)

(N=124)

Arterial thrombotic events

3 (2.3%)

2 (1.6%)

Venous thrombotic events

18 (14.1%)

9 (7.3%)

Epistaxis

21 (16.4%)

11 (8.9%)

Hypertension

17 (13.3%)

10 (8.1%)

Gastrointestinal bleeding

7 (5.5%)

5 (4.0%)

Proteinuria

6 (4.7%)

2 (1.6%)

Conclusion:

In this real life setting, the observed median

treatment duration of bevacizumab containing chemotherapy

was comparable to data found for elderly patients included

in other observational studies. In this group of elderly

patients, the observed safety profile was consistent with

the established safety profile of bevacizumab in prospective

randomized clinical trials and observational registry studies

in the global mCRC population.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Bevacizumab, elderly, safety, treatment duration

P011

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF FRENCH PHYSICIANS’

PRACTICES IN CAPECITABINE PRESCRIPTION FOR OLDER

PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC FIRST LINE BREAST CANCER

(CAPAGE STUDY)

D. Chauvière

1,

*, J. Viotti

2

, Y. Chateau

2

, P. Follana

3

, J.-M. Ferrero

3

,

O. Guerin

4

, E. Francois

5

, V. Mari

3

, R. Boulahssass

4

1

Clinical research,

2

Biostatistic Unit,

3

Medical oncology, Centre

Antoine Lacassagne,

4

UCOG Paca-est, CHU Nice,

5

UCOG Paca-est,

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Introduction:

CAPAGE is a retrospective study of French

physicians’ practices in capecitabine prescription for old

patients (70-year-old and more) with metastatic breast cancer.

In our experience, we thought originally that older patients

received a lower capecitabine dose treatment than younger

patient (less than 70).

Objectives:

The aimof this study is to compare capecitabine

doses received by old patients compared to young patients.

We also study differences in toxicities profiles between those

two classes of age.

Methods:

We used the DPD SEIN trial database which has

included 303 patients between 2008 and 2011 in 14 sites in

France. For our study, we’ve included 291 patients : 62 patients

were in the old class of age. We compared initial dose, total

dose and dose intensity for the first three cycles between old

and young patients. We also compared toxicities.

Results:

In univariate method analysis, Age significantly

influences initial dose prescription (p 0,0001), total dose

(p=0,002) and dose-intensity (p=0,026). Total dose is also

influenced by number of nodes at diagnostic (p=0,04) and

prior endocrine therapy for metastatic disease (p=0,013). In

multivariate method analysis, Age older than 70 and high

performance status were associated with lower total dose.

Toxicity was analysed in univariated methods analysis : no

difference was. Considering only severe toxicity (grade 3-4),

nauseas (p=0,030) and vomiting (p=0,007) were higher in

older patients. Considering moderate and severe toxicities

(grade 2-4), cutaneous toxicities were higher in older patients

(p=0,0001).

Conclusion:

Our study confirms that physicians prescribe

systematically lower dose of capecitabine for patients older

than 70. Toxicity profile confirms results found in literature.

We wanted to study relation between toxicity and Arti-

Hurria predictive score but there were not enough creatinine

clearance data available. Only the ONCODAGE screening

score could be calculated in a retrospective manner : as it

was expected, no relation were found between ONCODAGE

screening score and dose or toxicity. Prospective studies are

needed to confirm our results and correlate Arti-Hurria score

with toxicities.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Capecitabine, metastatic breast cancer, practices

P012

ASTER 70S OR OPTIMAL ADJUVANT TREATMENT FOR

WOMEN OVER 70 WITH LUMINAL BREAST CANCER:

A GERICO/UNICANCER PHASE III TRIAL

F. Coussy

1

, O. Mir

2

, E. Bourbouloux

3

, S. Kirscher

4

, O. Rigal

5

,

J.-M. Ferrero

6

, D. Allouache

7

, P. Cottu

8

, G. Romieu

9

, E. Blot

10

,

A.-M. Savoye

11

, X. Durando

12

, F. Duhoux

13

, L. Venat-Bouvet

14

,

E. Malaurie

15

, C. Lefeuvre

16

, J.-L. Canon

17

, M. Lacroix-Triki

18

,

F. Rollot

19

, F. Hermitte

20

, C. Orsini

21

, C. Dubot

22

, F. Bonnetain

23

,

E. G. C. Brain

1,

*

1

Medical Oncology, Institut Curie/Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-

Cloud,

2

Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif,

3

Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest ICO,

Nantes,

4

Instituts de cancérologie d’Avignon, Avignon,

5

Centre

Henri Becquerel, Rouen,

6

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice,

7

Centre

François Baclesse, Caen,

8

Institut Curie - Site Paris, Paris,

9

Institut