Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  108 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 108 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

S78

A B S T R A C T S

quality was low in 5 studies due to selection, performance and

detection bias, and only one (9%) had high quality.Therapeutic

validity was low in 5 studies (45%), mainly because of lacking

eligibility criteria for therapist or setting, or personalized

training. Interobserver agreement for methodological quality

and therapeutic validitywere good (0.80 and 0.76, respectively).

Sample sizes were relatively small (5-141 patients), only one

studie examined prehabilitation, treatment tolerance was

often not reported and methodological biases were common.

A meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity of

patients, outcomes and interventions.

Conclusion:

Home-based rehabilitation appears to im-

prove physical fitness in NSCLC patients. Although limited,

evidence seems quite consistent and feasible. Home-based

prehabilitation studies for NSCLC patients are scarce. Pros-

pective studies including larger patient samples are needed to

determine the feasibility and effectiveness of home-based (p)

rehabilitation on treatment tolerance, which ultimately could

lead to improved survival and quality of life.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Home-based, Non-small cell lung cancer, physical

fitness, prehabilitation, rehabilitation

P071

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF CARDIOTOXIC

DRUGS IN GERIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS: BEYOND

EJECTION FRACTION

G. Sokol

1,

*, L. Loftus

2

, J. Ayub

3

, L. Cantilena

1

1

Clinical Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the

Health Sciences, Bethesda,

2

Breast Program, Moffitt Cancer Center,

Tampa,

3

Florida Cancer Specialists, Hudson, USA

Introduction:

Many cancer patients are elderly and as such

often have a cardiovascular co-morbidity. Cytotoxic, targeted,

antiangiogenic agents, and monoclonal antibodies can affect

the cardiovascular system. Drug-associated cardiotoxicity

(CVTox) is commonly defined as cardiomyopathy reflected by

left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <50% on echocardiogram

(EC). Guidelines do not include other EC abnormalities that

may have clinical import.

Objectives:

This study determined the incidence of EC

abnormalities in addition to reduced EF on echocardiograms

of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (CHrx) and

explored potential clinical implications.

Methods:

50 patients, 36 F and 14 M, 65-97 years old,

mean age 70 years, median age 71 years, randomly selected

from a university affiliated practice from 2013-2016, who

received CHrx and underwent EC for evaluation were studied

for potential CHrx-induced CVTox. Tumor types included

25 breast, 4 lung, 7 gastrointestinal, 3 gynecologic, and 9

hematologic malignancies. 76 ECs were reviewed for EC

abnormalities including EF, valvular dysfunction, systolic or

diastolicdysfunction,pericardial disease,atrial andventricular

hypertrophy or dysfunction, and outflow hypertension. 27/50

patients received anthracyclines or trastuzumab while all

other patients received CHrx agents reported to have potential

CVTox. Observational statistics were applied.

Results:

46/50 patients had normal EFs. 9/50 patients had

no EC abnormalities. The remaining findings included 5 with

mild to severe pericardial effusions, 16 diastolic dysfunction,

15 valvular dysfunction, 12 cardiac chamber hypertrophy,

and 4 elevated outflow hypertension ranging from mild to

significant. Despite the findings of significant EC abnormalities

apart from EF, only detection of EF resulted in a change in the

CHrx regimen.

Conclusion:

CHrx, radiation therapy, targeted therapies, and

other oncologic agents can injure the cardiovascular system by

impairing heart function as well as enhancing hemodynamic

flow,thrombotic events,and conduction changes.The definition

for EC defined, drug-induced CVTox should include clinical EC

factors in addition to reduced EF that may have bearing on drug

dosing. Oncologists and pharmacists must be cognizant of the

multitude of EC adversities that may occur besides EF. Further

research will be necessary to enhance guidelines based on

factors other than EF.

Disclosure of interest:

None declared

Keywords:

Cardiotoxic drugs, echocardiogram, ejection

fraction

P072

PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY FROM THE EORTC (1221-ETF)

ON THE OCCURRENCE OF CANCER EVENTS IN BELGIAN

NURSING HOME RESIDENTS (NHR)

H. Wildiers

1,

*, M. Elseviers

2

, M. Mauer

3

, J. Dewolf

4

, E. Bastiaens

5

,

S. Hatse

6

, M. Hamaker

7

, F. Buntinx

8

, J. Delepeleire

9

,

G. Uytterschaut

10

, K. Tryfonidis

5

, M. Janssen-Hejinen

11

on behalf of EORTC Elderly Task Force

1

General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven,

2

Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Faculty of

Medicine, Antwerp,

3

EORTC- Headquarters, Brussels,

4

Drug

Research Unit Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent,

5

EORTC

headquarters, Brussels,

6

Laboratory of Experimental Oncology (LEO),

KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium,

7

Department of Geriatric Medicine,

Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands,

8

Department of General

Practice, Universities of Leuven and Maastricht,

9

Departement of

General Practice KU Leuven and University Psychiatric Hospital,

KULeuven, leuven,

10

Armonea, Mechelen, Belgium,

11

Department of

Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands

Introduction:

Despite cancer incidence increases with age

and more elderly becoming NHR, there is very little, and only

retrospective, information available regarding diagnostic and

therapeutic approaches and cancer outcomes in NHR.

Objectives:

In order to fill this knowledge gap, and allow

better care for NHR with cancer, the EORTC elderly task force

designed a large scale prospective study on diagnostic and

therapeutic decisions for cancer events in NHR.

Methods:

The study was set up in 39 nursing homes from

the Armonea network in Belgium, covering 4262 nursing home

beds. The primary goal was to describe cancer events, referral

patterns and motives for non-referral to advanced oncological